Skip to main content

Big Insurance Discounts – Is It Unfair For Healthy Behavior

Big Insurance Discounts – Is It Unfair For Healthy Behavior
Health Insurers could give heavy discounts to employees who would lose their weight or cholesterol level under health care professional. But the American Heart Association and others agency states that this is unfair to those people who don’t achieve fitness goals.

The discounts are being pushed which helped health care costs to lower down in supermarket chain whereas other companies have skyrocketed their costs. This proposal involves the sensitive issue of how aggressive the employers can be trying to induce the workers to change their approach to reduce the risk of diseases.

If you give someone a discount, someone else would be paying up more which has more than 60 groups who are fighting the same provision. Thus the people who are not able to change the approach and behavior would end up paying more costs. Under the current law, employers & insurers are being given discounts of up to 20 percent on the premiums, co-payments and deductibles which include anti-smoking and weight loss programs. Some programs may require just the participation into it to get discounts whereas other require to reduce their weight, blood pressure, or cholesterol by specific levels.

The groups which are fighting for such provisions say that the employees might want to exercise and eat right, while some may find that work schedule and family commitments prevent them from making lifestyle changes needed to improve health. Low income workers might not be able to afford membership along with employer’s subsidies.

Before passing this provision some health advocates are comfortable with linking of financial incentives and other factors such as recycling of prescriptions or monitoring blood sugar on regular basics. Employer groups are making an urge to lawmakers to increase discounts in premiums, deductibles which can give workers to participate in wellness programs.

Such health care provisions would increase employee participation in wellness programs and would have a cost savings effect on multiple levels for our health care systems. The Committee for this provision gave a statement that individual who can’t afford such standards can request waivers or alternative standards from employers. These employers need to ask for physician to certify that employees have existing condition which would prevent them from meeting health goals. The proposed provision’s official said that if the United Nations had adopted the approach in 2005 then the nation’s direct health care bill would be $550 billion which is less than it is today.

A spokesperson for the provision acknowledged that it hadn’t been an independent analysis, but they were able to see savings clearly from the first year theyimplemented the program.

Comments